A public or private employer may take possession of a completed facility, begin using it and still withhold substantial amounts on the basis of unresolved defects or an outstanding final completion certificate. The contractor may treat taking-over as conclusive proof that every payment is due. Neither position follows automatically. Construction contracts allocate distinct consequences to taking-over, defect correction, tests, retention release and final settlement. Each event should be matched to the exact edition and amendments of the applicable contract.
Taking-over changes obligations, not every right
Under many FIDIC forms, a taking-over certificate marks a significant transfer in care and the start of post-completion obligations. But testing obligations, outstanding work and the duty to remedy defects may continue. The employer's use of the works is relevant and may have contractual consequences, depending on the agreed wording. A contractor should distinguish physical occupation, an inauguration and formal contractual taking-over. The instrument issued, its date and any listed outstanding items are essential to the analysis.
Defects must be particularised
A general statement that work remains unsatisfactory is a weak foundation for indefinite retention. The employer should identify each alleged defect, applicable specification, supporting inspection, required remedial action and reasonable completion period. The contractor should respond with technical evidence and access requests. Allegations of poor performance should not be confused with unresolved design decisions, withheld drawings or third-party changes after the works were used. Costs of correction and contractual deduction rights must be analysed separately.
Retention and security serve defined functions
Retention money and performance security may secure different obligations and have distinct release triggers. The contract may require partial release at taking-over and a later balance after a defined event. An employer should identify the particular clause authorising any continued deduction and avoid using one security to recover amounts already accounted for elsewhere. The contractor should reconcile milestones, certified sums, actual payments, retention and any encashed guarantee. Double recovery is not justified simply by labelling amounts under different contractual headings.
Notices, determinations and dispute boards
FIDIC procedures often require notices, supporting particulars, assessments and determinations within specified periods. The 1999 and 2017 editions are not interchangeable, and particular conditions may substantially alter the standard mechanism. A contractor claiming costs caused by employer delay must preserve its own notice and causation evidence. The employer claiming defect costs also needs a contractual basis and proof. Where a DAAB or other adjudication mechanism is prescribed, the parties should assess appointment and referral requirements rather than proceeding on the assumption that final litigation is the only remedy.
Closing the project account
An effective close-out file lists the dates of tests, taking-over, defects notices, correction certificates, outstanding guarantees and release conditions. It should identify which matters are agreed and which require independent technical or contractual determination. The parties may settle discrete sums without abandoning unrelated claims if settlement language is carefully drafted. Final account negotiations should avoid a broad release that either side has not costed or understood.
Points to establish from the record
- Executed contract edition and particular conditions
- actual taking-over and testing record
- defects register with evidence and access dates
- retention and security ledger free of duplicates
- notices, determinations and dispute-board provisions
Practical conclusion
Taking-over is a major contractual milestone, not a blank cheque for either side. The lawful settlement depends on separating defects, payment certification, retention and claims, with each sum tied to a specific provision and factual event.
Legal materials and official sources
The governing text and any later amendments or notifications should be checked against the transaction date and the authority with jurisdiction.
Illustration: partial retention release after taking-over
Assume a project contract records PKR 20 million in retention and the particular conditions require one half to be released following contractual taking-over, with the balance due at a later identified milestone. If a valid taking-over certificate has been issued, an employer relying on alleged defects to withhold all PKR 20 million needs to identify the precise contractual authority for doing so. A defects notice may create a right to correction or an entitlement to specified recoverable cost, but it should not be treated automatically as a power to suspend an unrelated certified payment. The example is illustrative: FIDIC editions, amendments, certification and set-off terms differ, and there is no universal payment result independent of the executed contract.
Taking-over and defects should have separate registers
A close-out register should distinguish: the date the works became capable of use; any formal taking-over certificate; outstanding minor work expressly listed in that certificate; subsequent defects notices; remedial work undertaken; tests repeated; and a later performance or defect-period certification. Each entry should identify the notice sender, contractual clause, document and evidence of access. If the employer already operates the facility, inspection records should distinguish faults present at taking-over from damage arising through operation, intervention by others or maintenance conditions. A certificate issued without a complete register can generate a dispute about whether an issue was genuinely reserved.
Notice and valuation of remedial costs
An employer may reasonably incur costs to remedy a defect after following the contract's correction procedure, subject to the actual terms. The claim should identify the defect, opportunity given to remedy, work undertaken, necessity and reasonable cost. A general assertion that all outstanding defects justify withholding every unpaid milestone is different from a supported contractual calculation. Contractors should document access restrictions, remedial offers and the status of items they consider outside original scope. Both parties should avoid combining a defects claim, performance-security recovery and milestone deduction in a manner that obtains more than the loss or contractual entitlement permits.
Final account: reconcile every head of entitlement
A practical closing schedule should list certified work, unpaid milestones, retention movements, advances, security encashments, employer claims and agreed set-offs as separate lines. The team should mark amounts disputed, admitted or already realised through another route. If the contract specifies a determination or DAAB procedure, the schedule should identify the notice and referral status of each claim. Negotiating an omnibus final-account release without a reconciled schedule may extinguish a substantial separate entitlement or leave uncertainty about a payment supposedly settled. A defensible settlement states exactly which claims are compromised and which, if any, remain reserved.
The applicable legal position depends on the governing instruments, subsequent amendments and the facts of the matter. How we prepare and maintain legal commentary ↗