JUDGMENT ANALYSIS / Lahore High Court

FOUNDATION WIND ENERGY-II Versus COMMISSIONER PUNJAB REVENUE AUTHORITY

2026 PTD 542, 2026 LHC 1055 · 2026-01-28

1. Overview of the Case

This reference application challenged an order by the Appellate Tribunal of the Punjab Revenue Authority (PRA) regarding the recovery of sales tax from a service recipient. Consequently, the Court set aside the impugned order, the Order-in-Original, and the show-cause notice, affirming that the PRA's jurisdiction is limited to services rendered within Punjab.

2. Brief Facts

Facts, in brief, necessary for the determination of the questions raised in the present reference application, are that the Assessing Officer issued a show-cause notice dated 15.06.2016 alleging therein that during the tax period from 01.07.2014 to 30.06.2015 the applicant received taxable services and made payments to contractors amounting to Rs.3,051,749,123/- without deducting and withholding Punjab Sales Tax of Rs.488,279,856/-, and further failed to file the requisite returns/withholding statements before the Punjab Revenue Authority in violation of the provisions of the Act . The present reference application was filed under Section 67A of the Ordinance , wherein the applicant raised, inter alia, questions of law regarding the legality of confirmation of sales tax under the Act on services allegedly received in the Province of Sindh, as well as the jurisdiction of the authorities to invoke the provisions of the Act in respect of such services.

3. Questions of Law

  1. Can the Punjab Revenue Authority initiate recovery proceedings under Section 52 of the Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act, 2012 against a service recipient in the capacity of a withholding agent?
  2. Does the Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act, 2012 authorize the levy of sales tax on services rendered outside the Province of Punjab?

4. The Court’s Answers

Question 1

Can the Punjab Revenue Authority initiate recovery proceedings under Section 52 of the Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act, 2012 against a service recipient in the capacity of a withholding agent?

THE COURT’S ANSWER

“For the foregoing reasons, we allow this reference application and set aside the impugned order as well as Order-in-Original and show-cause notice and hold that the Appellate Tribunal fell in error by sustaining the impugned proceedings and by affirming the jurisdiction of the Punjab Revenue Authority against the applicant.”

Paragraph 14

Question 2

Does the Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act, 2012 authorize the levy of sales tax on services rendered outside the Province of Punjab?

THE COURT’S ANSWER

“For the foregoing reasons, we allow this reference application and set aside the impugned order as well as Order-in-Original and show-cause notice and hold that the Appellate Tribunal fell in error by sustaining the impugned proceedings and by affirming the jurisdiction of the Punjab Revenue Authority against the applicant.”

Paragraph 14

5. Practical Relevance

Businesses and withholding agents should test each asserted liability against the enabling statute, territorial scope and taxable transaction. Recovery demands and delegated rules require particular scrutiny before compliance or challenge.

← Back to all judgments