NINETY TWO CHAMBERS / LEGAL ANALYSIS

When an Insurer Refuses a Commercial Claim: Exclusions and Notification

An insured business may suffer a substantial loss and believe payment is assured because the relevant event appears in the policy's headline description. Insurance recovery turns on the operative wording, exclusions, warranties, notification duties and evidence of the actual loss.

Read the insuring clause before arguing about fairness

A policy grants coverage for defined risks, often subject to limits and conditions. The insured must identify the event, interest and loss falling within the agreement. A claim may fail because the event is excluded, a waiting period applies or the particular property or activity was not insured. The insurer's rejection should identify the precise clause and factual basis relied upon. General references to 'policy terms' do not permit meaningful review. Equally, an insured cannot assume that commercial hardship expands coverage beyond the agreed risk.

Disclosure and warranties may affect entitlement

Insurance arrangements can impose duties concerning material information, risk controls and notification of changes. The consequences of non-compliance depend on the policy and applicable law. A warranty concerning fire protection, equipment maintenance or permitted use should be assessed by reference to its precise wording and relevance. The business should retain proposal forms, declarations, inspection reports and correspondence before and after inception. A dispute over alleged misrepresentation becomes much harder to resolve when the parties cannot identify what was disclosed during placement.

Notification and cooperation create a parallel record

Policies may require prompt notice, preservation of damaged property, reasonable mitigation and cooperation with loss adjusters. The insured should establish the applicable deadlines and record its response. Late notice is a contractual issue whose consequence should not be assumed without examining the policy and law. Loss adjusters' requests should be answered accurately, with underlying invoices, asset registers and evidence of damage. The insurer may also need access to inspect the cause of loss, subject to reasonable protection of the insured's operations and information.

Quantification is independent of coverage

Even where liability to indemnify is admitted, the amount payable may be contested. Deductibles, sublimits, depreciation, replacement cost, business interruption periods and salvage can affect the calculation. A loss-of-profit claim should be supported by reliable trading figures and causation evidence rather than a simple projection of anticipated revenue. The insured should distinguish uninsured expenditure from sums covered under another policy or recoverable from a responsible third party. A coherent claims schedule reduces disputes and guards against double recovery.

Make the insurance claim provable

Insurance disputes should proceed clause by clause and figure by figure. Counsel must distinguish whether the risk was insured, whether conditions were satisfied and what loss is proved. A carefully assembled claims file is ordinarily more persuasive than an appeal to the seriousness of the event.

NINETY TWO CHAMBERS / LEGAL ADVISORY

When the issue arises in practice.

Our advice begins with the governing documents, the legal position and the decision that needs to be made.

DISCUSS THIS MATTER

This publication is for general information and does not constitute legal advice on any particular matter.